Tracking Emissions to Drive Reduction

Carbon Footprint Tracking

From how we power our plants to how we design processes and products, carbon outcomes are shaped by daily operational choices. Our approach focuses on measuring consistently, improving systematically, and disclosing transparently.

What we measure

We track greenhouse-gas emissions across Scope 1 and Scope 2, along with intensity metrics linked to turnover and physical output. FY 2025 reporting reflects methodology updates made for improved consistency, and includes both absolute emissions and intensity disclosures.

  • Scope 1: 657.40 ktCO₂e
  • Scope 2: 79.11 ktCO₂e
  • Scope 1 + 2 (total): 736.51 ktCO₂e
  • Intensity (physical output): 0.00159 ktCO₂e
Image

How we strengthen Measurement Quality 

Image

Real-Time Tracking Through Project JIVAN

Carbon tracking sits within a broader performance system under Project JIVAN (Vision for Actionable Net-positivity), which we use to embed environmental considerations into business decisions and build accountability across the organisation. To accelerate this, we partnered with an academic body to build ESG knowledge, a global advisor to shape credible initiatives, and a digital ESG platform that enables real-time tracking of performance.

Methodology Discipline and Disclosures

Our disclosures reference structured reporting practices and the use of standards and frameworks to support comparability and transparency over time.
Image
Image

Product Carbon Footprinting

Operational emissions tell only part of the story for a chemistry-led portfolio. To deepen product-level understanding, we conducted a Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) study for 28 products, based on Life Cycle Assessment (cradle-to-gate) following ISO 14067:2018, and engaged third-party assurance for the cradle-to-gate LCA-based PCF outcomes.

Turning Measurement into Reduction Actions

Tracking matters because it points to where changes deliver real outcomes. FY 2025 disclosures note that the Company implemented energy-saving projects across manufacturing sites that resulted in reduced GHG emissions, including boiler-efficiency improvements, turbine configuration changes, technology changes that reduced utility loads at site level, and steam-consumption reduction initiatives across locations.

In parallel, we have engaged a third-party consultant to support further greening of power across facilities as part of our climate-mitigation commitment
Image